<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>

<!--templates/rss.tpl.php-->

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
    <title>Edtags.org: aseldow: s49</title>
    <link>http://edtags.org/</link>
    
    <description>Recent bookmarks posted to Edtags.org</description>
    <ttl>60</ttl>


    <item>
        <title>Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act: DOPA Jr, DOPA Extra, or Just Dopey | BlogHer</title>
	<link>http://www.blogher.org/node/15001</link>
	<description>Senator Ted Stevens, who last entered our radar screen when he described the internet as a series of tubes, has introduced Senate Bill 49 which appears to encompass everything we objected to about DOPA, plus more. DOPA, after passing with an overwhelming majority in the House then died from stagnation in the Senate with the end of the Congressional session.Though some are calling it DOPA, JR, it m</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>dopa jr.</category>
		<category>s49</category>
		<category>deleting online predator act</category>
		<category>communications act of 1934</category>
		<category>blog</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>Text of s.49 and s.1965 : Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act</title>
	<link>http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=110_cong_bills&amp;docid=f:s49is.txt.pdf</link>
	<description>Full text of the Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act (DOPA, jr.).</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:26:27 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>dopa jr.</category>
		<category>deleting online predators</category>
		<category>dopa</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>TLF: Would Your Favorite Website be Banned by DOPA?</title>
	<link>http://www.techliberation.com/archives/042146.php</link>
	<description>TLF readers, I need your help. As most of you know, many federal and state lawmakers are suggesting that “social networking websites” need to be regulated in the name of keeping minors safe online. So far, regulatory proposals have come in two varieties: (1) an outright ban on such sites in publicly funded schools and libraries, or (2) mandatory age verification of users before they are allowed on the sites.</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 04:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>dopa jr.</category>
		<category>s49</category>
		<category>deleting online predator act</category>
		<category>communications act of 1934</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>The Education Bazaar » Blog Archive » Vendor-Driven Misperceptions about Web 2.0 in Schools</title>
	<link>http://teachers4schools.com/open/?p=16</link>
	<description>DOPA, jr. mention</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>dopa jr.</category>
		<category>s49</category>
		<category>deleting online predator act</category>
		<category>communications act of 1934</category>
		<category>vendors</category>
		<category>cio</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>Blog posts related to S.49 - Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act</title>
	<link>http://www.opencongress.org/bill/110-s49/atom_blogs</link>
	<description>Blog posts for a bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the carriage of child pornography by video service providers, to protect children from online predators, and to restrict the sale or purchase of children?s personal information in interstate commerce.</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:50:27 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>dopa jr.</category>
		<category>s49</category>
		<category>deleting online predator act</category>
		<category>communications act of 1934</category>
		<category>blog</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>GovTrack: S. 49: Text of Legislation (DOPA, jr.)</title>
	<link>http://www.govtrack.us/congress/billtext.xpd?bill=s110-49</link>
	<description>To amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the carriage of child pornography by video service providers, to protect children from online predators, and to restrict the sale or purchase of children's personal information in interstate commerce.

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

January 4, 2007

Mr. STEVENS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 03:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>dopa jr.</category>
		<category>s49</category>
		<category>deleting online predator act</category>
		<category>communications act of 1934</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>DOPA Jr. Is Not A Wikipedia Ban | WebProNews</title>
	<link>http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/02/15/dopa-jr-is-not-a-wikipedia-ban</link>
	<description>It's easy to understand why people would be skeptical, or even suspicious, of anything Alaska Senator Ted Stevens introduces into Congress these days, especially if it involves the Internet – or, the tubes and all that. But the simply-titled Senate Bill 49, which some have called &quot;Son of DOPA&quot; or &quot;DOPA Jr.,&quot; may not be as bad as its made out</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 02:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>dopa</category>
		<category>dopa jr.</category>
		<category>illdopa</category>
		<category>online predators</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>laws</category>
		<category>s49</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>U.S. Senate Committee on Commerce, Science: Sen. Steven's comment on S.49 (DOPA Jr.)</title>
	<link>http://commerce.senate.gov/public/index.cfm?FuseAction=PressReleases.Detail</link>
	<description>Senator Stevens submitted the following statement for the record:

The Internet is a dynamic space where Americans turn to get information, do research, and exchange ideas.

Given the increasingly important role of the Internet in education and commerce, it differs from other media like TV and cable because parents cannot prevent their children from using the Internet altogether.  The headlines continue to tell us of children who are victimized online.  While the issues are difficult, I believe Congress has an important role to play to ensure that the protections available in other parts of our society find their way to the Internet.  Since introducing the Protecting Children Online in the 21st Century Act, my staff and I have worked with a wide variety of advocacy groups on this topic. In response to the feedback we have received, my staff are currently circulating a new draft wth four primary goals.</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>stevens</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>alaska</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>Don't Talk; Don't Share: Protecting Children in the 21st Century</title>
	<link>http://www.districtadministration.com/pulse/commentpost.aspx?news=no</link>
	<description>Ironically, in the real world outside the beltway, TIME Magazine just named ‘You,’ the end user, its Person of the Year for 2006, proclaiming on the mylar mirrored cover, &quot;Yes, you. You control the Information Age. Welcome to Your World.&quot; It would appear that the rejoinder is being written by Congress and it is, “Not in this school; not in this library.&quot; So while we exhort administrators and flog teachers to bring schooling into the 21st Century of technology use, our government officials are creating fear-based regulations that continue to make it near impossible to do anything meaningful with technology other than drill students on self-contained local networks of canned curricular material. Maybe I should have entitled this blog entry, Congress Seeks Restrictions on TIME Mag. Person of the Year, because that is the net effect (pun intended).</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:40:42 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
		<category>con</category>
		<category>protecting children</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>senate</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>EdVentures in Technology » Senate Bill 49 - Protecting children in the 21st Century Act</title>
	<link>http://www.whitemountaintech.net/wordpress/2007/02/17/senate-bill-49-protecting-children-in-the-21st-century-act/</link>
	<description>The problem I see with this bill, as with many bills proposed by either party, is that on the surface it appears to address a certain obvious problem. In this case, the general theme is that we are trying to protect our children from digital predators, unscrupulous marketing agencies, oh yes, and themselves. It sends the message, what sort of person would NOT want to protect our children? And places those who oppose the bill’s other tenets in a very uncomfortable position. The question is, what is the unspoken intent and resultant fall-out of this bill should it become law?</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
		<category>con</category>
		<category>protecting children</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>senate</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>The Official Weblog of Henry Jenkins: The Only Thing We Have to Fear... S49 &amp; DOPA</title>
	<link>http://www.henryjenkins.org/2007/02/the_only_thing_we_have_to_fear.html</link>
	<description>In both cases, these bills, which are based on a fundamentally wrong-headed understanding of the issues they are designed to address, attracted or are likely to attract significant levels of bipartisan support. Indeed, in a highly partisan political climate, these kind of bills may be the only pieces of legislation which pass with little or no debate and with overwhelming support.</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:03:15 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>con</category>
		<category>against</category>
		<category>anti s49</category>
		<category>pc21ca</category>
		<category>p21</category>
		<category>protecting children</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
		<category>jenkins</category>
		<category>mit</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>WashingtonWatch.com - S. 49, The Protecting Children in the 21st Century Act</title>
	<link>http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/110_SN_49.html</link>
	<description>S. 49 would amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the carriage of child pornography by video service providers, to protect children from online predators, and to restrict the sale or purchase of children's personal information in interstate commerce.</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>con</category>
		<category>against</category>
		<category>anti s49</category>
		<category>pc21ca</category>
		<category>p21</category>
		<category>protecting children</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>PBS Teachers | learning.now . Lifting the Hood on DOPA Jr. | PBS</title>
	<link>http://www.pbs.org/teachers/learning.now/2007/01/lifting_the_hood_on_dopa_jr.html</link>
	<description>From an educator’s perspective, there’s no doubt the focus of discussion will be on Title II of the bill. Very little has changed since the original DOPA language was introduced in May 2007. I’m sure that the anti-cyberbullying aspects of the bill will be seen as a step in the right direction, though its lack of clarity on the subject may raise some eyebrows. Even with this language, though, educa</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>pc21ca</category>
		<category>p21</category>
		<category>protecting children</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>Anastasia Goodstein: You Can't Delete Danger - Living Now on The Huffington Post</title>
	<link>http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anastasia-goodstein/you-cant-delete-danger_b_40091.html</link>
	<description>Title II, or what Carvin is calling DOPA Jr., is a misguided lawmaker's attempt to use legislation to fix some of the messy issues that have arisen from totally wired teenagers' widespread use of the Net.</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>con</category>
		<category>against</category>
		<category>anti s49</category>
		<category>pc21ca</category>
		<category>p21</category>
		<category>protecting children</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
    </item>	
	
	

    <item>
        <title>S. 49: A bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the carriage of child... (GovTrack.us)</title>
	<link>http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s110-49</link>
	<description>A bill to amend the Communications Act of 1934 to prevent the carriage of child pornography by video service providers, to protect children from online predators, and to restrict the sale or purchase of children's personal information in interstate commerce.</description>
	<dc:creator>aseldow</dc:creator>
        <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 17:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
        		<category>s49</category>
		<category>pc21ca</category>
		<category>p21</category>
		<category>protecting children</category>
		<category>senate</category>
		<category>bill</category>
		<category>act</category>
		<category>legislation</category>
		<category>congress</category>
		<category>dopa</category>
		<category>children</category>
		<category>social networking</category>
		<category>dopa jr</category>
    </item>	
	
	

</channel>
</rss>
